Skip to main content

Forensic Video Workflow with Amped FIVE – Part Three: Reporting and Presentation

Reading time: 6 min

In the finale, video evidence analysis becomes presentation. With Amped FIVE, we redact what must stay hidden, sync media on a single timeline, add crisp annotations, and generate a protected, transparent, professional, and court-ready report.

Forensic video workflow with Amped FIVE: reporting and presentation

We’re nearing the end of our full case workflow in Amped FIVE.  If you haven’t read the first two parts of this story, then I highly recommend you read part one and part two.

To recap our case, we’re following a full FIVE workflow within a murder investigation using the following steps:

  • Acquiring the video evidence, verification and creating the project
  • File analysis, editing, adjustments and correcting issues
  • Presentation elements, ready for court

I am the video analyst in this case and I’ve been provided with video from a body worn camera, a drone, a mobile phone, a dashcam and from CCTV outside an apartment building where the crime is said to have taken place.

I’ve already performed hashing, an initial review of the files to gain a brief understanding of what I’m working with, before conducting a file analysis stage. This also included preparing my files for this stage of my case, the presentation. I know my original video evidence files are preserved, but I want to tell a story with this case to present to the court, showing the movements of the suspect on the day. Not only that, but I’ll want to produce a report showing everything I’ve done, ready to disclose to both prosecution and defence, and maintain transparency in my work. OK, let’s get to work.

So we’re going to be going through the following steps in this post:

  • Redaction
  • Combining media and creating timelines
  • Presentation elements
  • Bookmarking
  • Forensic reporting

Let’s kick things off with redaction first.

Redaction

One of my first concerns is that I know an undercover officer was utilized in the search for the suspect.  There are operationally sensitive callsigns, moments in which we see the officer’s face and information present in the body worn camera footage that we don’t want broadcast in a public setting. My first port of call will be to redact the sensitive audio using Audio Redaction.

Video frame showing a view looking upward through dense tree foliage with sunlight filtering through the leaves, creating a contrast between the shaded canopy and the bright blue sky. The timestamp ‘2025/06/10 19:41:20’ appears in the lower left corner, and the on-screen text ‘Audio Redacted’ is displayed at the bottom center. The image suggests a body worn camera or outdoor surveillance recording captured in a wooded or forested area.

Waveform view of an audio track displayed in the Amped FIVE Player interface, showing red amplitude peaks representing sound intensity over time. The highlighted blue segments mark selected audio portions for playback or analysis. The playback controls appear above the waveform, showing frame number 763, timestamp 00:00:12.714, and video file details "MOVI0002.mp4 (1920x1080, 60.0000 fps)". This view assists forensic analysts in identifying key audio events or speech segments within a video file.

You can see the sections of the video here where I’ve redacted the audio and this is helpfully displayed on the footage itself. I’ve also used Annotate and Hide here to hide the portions of the video where the officer’s face is visible. We’ve already explained and addressed the strange discrepancy in the timestamp during our analysis of this file earlier on in this series, so this is my opportunity to remind you to first check out the previous posts if you haven’t already!

Combining Media and Creating Timelines

Another thing I want to do is link together the drone footage with the map image showing the GPS coordinates. I can do this using Video Mixer and here I’ve set the files to be shown vertically side-by-side.

Comparison of two aerial images displayed in Amped FIVE, showing the same rural landscape from different perspectives. The top image captures a drone view of a tree-lined field and footpath under daylight conditions, while the bottom image, from Google Earth, provides a wider satellite view of the same area with surrounding vegetation and pathways. The analysis helps verify location consistency between recorded footage and mapped satellite imagery for forensic geolocation purposes.

A nice presentation feature, especially if you’re creative with maps and animations.

The next step is the biggest one at this stage:  to create my timeline of all the footage together using Timeline. Just a reminder, when dealing with videos from different sources, you’ll need to use Convert Frame Rate to make sure they all have the same FPS. More on that in this Tip Tuesday post. I’ve already made sure all my files share the same frame rate and now, I’m just going to select the chains and filters I want, in the desired order.

Screenshot of the Timeline filter settings panel in Amped FIVE, showing multiple synchronized video sources listed under the "Inputs" tab. The selected file "Witness Footage – VID_20250611_062051" is highlighted with a context menu offering options such as Insert Before, Insert After, Add All, and Move Up or Down. The panel allows users to manage and align multiple video inputs, such as witness and police footage, for accurate timeline reconstruction in forensic video analysis.

The side buttons within the Filter Settings for Timeline such as Move Up/Move Down will help with moving videos around when you’re creating the sequence. I click Apply and FIVE will create a new output chain of all my video evidence in the order I wish.

Presentation Elements

Now we’ve got our sequence of events sorted, I can begin adding any presentation elements, if I need them.

I’m going to start by adding some annotations using Annotate.

Annotated CCTV frame displayed in Amped FIVE showing a residential courtyard with red brick buildings, a green lawn, and timestamp "2025-06-11 10:20:51.880". The overlay label reads "Exhibit LCS/1/AM53D – Timeline of Events 11/06/2025", positioned in the lower-left corner. On the right, the Annotate filter settings panel displays options for adding image overlays, adjusting border color and thickness, and managing annotation tracking, part of a forensic video presentation workflow.

You can see I’ve added some text and a logo here, just to make sure my evidence is identifiable straightaway and looks professional. I’ve also set these annotations for all frames so they appear throughout the file without interruption. If I had more than one suspect, I could also add shapes and track each subject.  In this case, however, I’m happy with this output.

I’ll now write the video into a new file so I can make sure that file is ready for any annotations using Video Writer. This will just help me to keep track of what I’m working with. I’m only writing out the one video. However, if I had a number of videos I wanted to process I could use the new Writing Queue function. This would allow me to queue these tasks up whilst I continue working and then run the Writing Queue just before I leave for the day. Really worth checking that feature out if you haven’t already!

Bookmarking

I’ve now got my presentation timeline video sorted.  There are a couple of final things I need to do before I generate my report – bookmarking is one of them. I want the report to show certain steps of my workflow, so by selecting these bookmarks, I’ll be able to demonstrate the elements I want to emphasize. You can do this throughout your case with each step if you prefer, but in this instance, I’m doing so towards the end of my workflow.

Screenshot of the Bookmarks panel in Amped FIVE showing organized evidence categories titled "Police Search" and "Suspect Movements". Under Police Search are bookmarks for "Drone – Suspect Seen", "BWV – Identification", and "BWV – Moment of Arrest". The Suspect Movements section includes bookmarks for events such as "Suspect Leaving Scene", "Suspect Runs Past Witness Vehicle", and "Murder Weapon in Situ at Deposition Site". Each bookmark represents key moments in the forensic video analysis timeline for case reconstruction.

Forensic Reporting

Now all that’s left to do is use Generate Report to produce a protected PDF of my work documented by FIVE throughout this case. When I export my report now, not only do I see all my hashes, working and scientific references, but I also see all the bookmarks I selected earlier.

Composite image from Amped FIVE forensic video analysis report showing three sequential CCTV and dashcam frames tracking a suspect’s movements. The first frame captures a residential courtyard with timestamp 2025-06-11 10:20:54, labeled "Suspect Runs Past Witness Vehicle". The second frame shows a dashcam perspective of a person running past a parked van under timestamp 2015/10/11 17:15:42, labeled "Suspect On Cycle Path". The third frame shows the suspect jogging along a narrow wooded cycle path, labeled "Suspect Leaving Cycle Path". Each image is annotated with chain, filter, and frame position metadata for evidential tracking.

…And I’m done! My project and generated materials (video files and reports) can all be produced and retained as necessary.  All I need to do is wait for a trial date to be set in order to present my evidence. I think it’s time for a coffee after all that first though…

Screenshot of Amped FIVE displaying an annotated video frame showing the back of a person in a red shirt walking outdoors under a clear blue sky. The overlay label reads "Exhibit LCS/1/AM53D – Timeline of Events 11/06/2025". The interface shows the Annotate filter settings panel on the right, with options for image overlay, transparency, and border customization. Below the video, the player timeline shows frame position and annotation ranges, while the history panel tracks processing steps such as hash code, timestamp, and frame rate conversion for forensic documentation.

Finally

We’ve reached the end of our case – our evidence has been verified, analyzed, edited and adjusted where necessary. Now, it is in a format that is ready for court presentation. Our entire workflow has also been documented using FIVE’s forensic reporting, complete with appropriate bookmarks to clarify my working processes. What I’ve demonstrated hopefully gives you an insight into the typical problems faced with different types of media and how to overcome or explain them. With a product like FIVE, I know everything I am doing is auditable, robust and will stand up to the scrutiny I may face in the upcoming trial for this case. My final task will be to retain what I need to in accordance with my organization’s data retention policy before making a well-deserved coffee!

Hopefully, you’ve enjoyed seeing how Amped FIVE can be a one-stop tool for the entirety of your case and whilst dealing with different sources of digital media evidence.

If you have any questions or want to discuss this or any other topic we’ve covered here in more detail, then our Support team is always here to help.


 Lucy Carey-Shields

Lucy Carey-Shields is a forensic analyst with Amped Software, primarily providing technical support to Amped users. Her career started as a front-line officer with UK law enforcement in 2010 where she spent six years before graduating from her degree in computer forensics in 2014, when she shortly afterwards started work in a digital forensics unit alongside her front-line duties. She now has over ten years of law enforcement and digital forensics experience in both video, mobile and computer forensics cases.

Subscribe to our Blog

Receive an email notification when a new blog post is published and don’t miss out on our latest updates, how-tos, case studies and much more content!